The Luncheon Society—SF/Academy Award winning Jeremy Larner and the 40th anniversary of “The Candidate”/Palio d’Asti/November 5, 2012

“Son, you’re a politician.”

It’s the look of horror that appears on Robert Redford’s face that says it all.  Redford’s character, Bill McKay, has beaten up Crocker Jarmon in a statewide debate.  Jarmon, now running for his 4th term as Senator, now realizes that he is the race of his life.

After the debate, McKay’s father—a former California Governor—pays him the ultimate compliment, knowing that his comments would probably cut to the bone.  By becoming a politician, McKay has now gone the route that he would never travel; he has essentially sold his soul for little in return.  On the evening when Redford’s McKay pulls off the upset over Jarmon, he escapes to an empty hotel room with his mercenary campaign manager, a Stanford classmate played by Peter Boyle, and asks, “What do we do now?”

Since we were on the eve of the 2012 presidential election, we thought it would be fun to look back at a political campaign classic.  In 1972, director Michael Ritchie and Robert Redford debuted “The Candidate,” a film released to strong reviews.  It was a script written by Jeremy Larner and we got together with him at Palio d’Asti in San Francisco.

“The Candidate” is to political junkies as “The Godfather” is for everybody else. There are certain moments within that movie that are acted so realistically and filmed with an eye of a documentarian.  Most films about political campaigns have an artificial feel about them as if they were created by those whose only connection with the political world came from stepping into a voting booth.

When Robert Evans saw the first screening of The Godfather, he complained to Francis Ford Coppola that he wanted to smell the spaghetti on the screen and told him to add another 40 minutes to the story.  A classic was made. When you watch “The Candidate,” you can still smell the aroma of a campaign, its frenetic energy, right down to the stale pizza.  Since this was filmed in the 1970’s, you can also smell the cigars in the smoke-filled rooms.

81st Academy Awards¨ Press Kit ImagesJeremy Larner won an Academy Award for best original screenplay for “The Candidate.”  I actually held it and made a quiet acceptance speech of my own. 

Why it worked. In 1992, New York Time film critic AO Scott took another look at the film and marveled at its ability to remain relevant and look fresh years after all of these years.  The film worked was because Jeremy Larner was a political speechwriter who had seen the hurly burley of a political campaign up close.  In 1968, he served at Gene McCarthy’s main speechwriter during the campaign, first against Lyndon Johnson before he dropped out and Bobby Kennedy, as he stepped into the fray. At the tumultuous Democratic Convention in Chicago, he not only wrote McCarthy’s speeches but also crafted the speech that Julian Bond delivered to an electrified audience.

Ritchie and Redford were also smart in another way. Unlike most motion pictures, where the screenwriter is finished when the final draft of the script is turned into the producer, they kept Jeremy Larner on the set because they wanted to make sure that the film’s cinéma vérité style captured the flavor of a chaotic adventure that comes with a political campaign. Ritchie was careful to splice in footage that showed Redford at campaign events alongside the big players of the day, like Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Jesse Unruh, or even Sam Yorty. ABC News Howard K. Smith offered commentary on the nightly news, national columnists like Evans and Novak are mentioned throughout, the number of local and national reporters, Rollin Post, Ken Jones, Bill Stout, Mike Wallace, Maury Green, and Fred Van Amberg portrayed themselves gave the sense that this was an honest-to-god campaign for higher office.  Rumor has it that Tom Brokaw was asked and declined, something he has regretted ever since.

What Redford wanted to accomplish was to take an idealistic and somewhat standoffish and put him through the meat grinder that comes with a political endeavor, where your standards and beliefs are ground down to a stub by the time Election Days rolls around.  In the case of McKay, the Peter Boyle character promises that he can “say and do what he wants.” He even offers a guarantee, written on the inside of a matchbook, which reads, “You Lose.” The further he gets into the race, especially as the prospects of his victory begin to improve as the race tightens, the more he sells his soul.  By the end of the movie, he has won a race for the Senate but has lost himself in the process.

The Movie and The Myth.  Like The Godfather, a certain mythology has grown up around the film, right down to the factual basis of Redford’s character.  The common thread is that the Redford character and his father, former California Governor John J McKay (played by Melvyn Douglass) was thought to be based on the relationship between Pat and Jerry Brown.  Looking backwards at history, it dovetails with the elder Brown’s traditional approach to coalition based politics of the day and his son’s feeling about it, which ranged from standoffishness to downright revulsion. However, when the screen play was written after the 1968 election, Jerry Brown had not run for statewide office yet. When the film was released in 1972, he was California’s Secretary of State, on the lower rung of statewide elective offices.

When Larner wrote the film, it was scripted right down to the moment, which in other films would have the result of improve or ad-libbing.  There is one scene where Redford’s character is sitting in the backseat of a car muttering riffs from his standards stump speech, before devolving into a wickedly funny impersonation of a Richard Nixon.  It was scripted right down to the very end.

The one character that Larner wished he fleshed out more was the role of Nancy, Bill McKay’s wife, who was played by Karen Carlson.  As the narrative continues throughout the film, McKay’s life gets drown out by campaign clichés while her life begins to take shape.  Larner intuitively felt that her life was starting to take some form after being married to a reasonably wealthy slacker for the better part of a decade.  However, that was one these that never found its way into the film and it was something Larner always regretted.

Some, like Dan Quayle never understood that the film is really a cautionary tale of what happens when you slowly chip away at your ideals, and trim your sails and you find yourself with little more than an empty prize and an tarnished soul at the end of the game.  Quayle, on the other hand, said that this movie got him to think about a political career.

As the producers got ready for the release of the film, they drummed up support by creating a series of fake campaign rallies that dovetailed with the 1972 Democratic National Convention in Miami Beach.  Hotel ballrooms were rented for advance screenings and even a whistle-stop tour took place.  In the end, the movie was released to great reviews and did moderately well at the box office.  The producers were pleased that a little movie that leveraged Redford’s box office appeal a film or two after “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” could find sunlight in a season that also produced such films as Cabaret, The Godfather, The Poseidon Adventure, and What’s up Doc.  The film found new life with the emergence of DVDs.  As a smaller, film, it also gave Redford a chance to play a larger role on how the storyline was crafted, thus serving as a seed that would germinate in later projects he helped develop like All The President’s Men, and Ordinary People which gave him his Academy Award for won Best Picture.

There has always even talk that has ebbed and flowed throughout the years about a Candidate sequel and several treatments were prepared for Redford, but his other interests always crowded out the calendar and we will never know what ever became of Bill McKay as a US Senator, something that an earlier luncheon on Redford with Michael Feeney Callan and Larner both confirmed.  Besides, Redford was never one who liked to participate in sequels and instead always opted to create something new.

As for the film itself, it holds up well four decades after its initial release.  It caught the moment just before campaigns and campaigning became professionalized full-time employment and you could still run a solid statewide race for under a half million dollars.   When you watch documentaries, DA Pennebaker’s War Room, which followed the 1992 Clinton campaign staff from New Hampshire, to the Convention, and beyond to the White House, you can see the stylistics of The Candidate dovetail throughout that film.  It is one of those few moments where the work of fiction presaged the actual story.

luncheon-logo-fc7The Luncheon Society ™ is a series of private luncheons and dinners that take place in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Manhattan, and Boston. We essentially split the costs of gathering and we meet in groups of 20-25 people. Discussions center on politics, art, science, film, culture, and whatever else is on our mind. Think of us as “Adult Drop in Daycare.” We’ve been around since 1997 and we’re purposely understated. These gatherings takes place around a large table, where you interact with the main guest and conversation becomes end result. There are no rules, very little structure, and the gatherings happen when they happen. Join us when you can.

The Luncheon Society-NY/Neil Barofsky–Chief Watchdog of the government’s TARP program and author of “Bailout: An Inside Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street/Blue Water Grill/October 18, 2012

Bailout Book CoverJim Day, a great lawyer, a good friend, and longtime member of The Luncheon Society suggested that we should have Neil Barofsky join The Luncheon Society for a conversation.  It was a wise choice. His book, Bailout: An Inside Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street, was published in July 2012.  In this excerpt, Barofsky explains the problems he saw with the Home Affordable Modification Program. HAMP — implemented in March 2009 as part of the Making Homes Affordable Program — was a loan modification program designed to reduce monthly payments for homeowners who were delinquent or at risk for delinquency in repaying their mortgages.  This excerpt was “borrowed” from the Bill Moyers.

Below is an excerpt from Bailout

“The flood of trial modifications caused the servicers’ systems to first buckle and then break as borrowers seeking to make their modifications permanent flooded the underequipped servicers with millions of pages of documents. The servicers’ performance was abysmal: they routinely “lost” or misplaced borrowers’ documents, with one servicer telling us that a subcontractor had lost an entire trove of HAMP materials. Borrowers routinely complained that they’d had to send their documents to their servicers multiple times — a survey by ProPublica found that borrowers had to submit documents on average six times — but the servicers would still claim that the documents had never been received and then foreclose. The sheer volume also meant that fully qualified borrowers got lost in the storm; servicers would later confess to us that the sheer volume from Treasury’s verbal trial modification surge made it nearly impossible for them to separate the modifications that fully qualified and had a chance to be successful from those that were hopeless.

Making matters even worse, Treasury all but paved the way for outright fraud by ignoring my recommendation that it kick off HAMP with a broad nationwide television and radio advertising campaign that would educate home owners about program details and warn them of the dangers of program-related fraud. Continue reading

The Luncheon Society—LA/Tom Hayden and the 50th anniversary The Port Huron Statement/Napa Valley Grille/October 8, 2012

tom-haydenThe 1960’s began when The Port Huron Statement was completed.

Years ago, folksinger Phil Ochs wrote a biting song titled, “Love me I’m a Liberal,” that skewers the 1950’s and early 1960’s suburban liberals whose actions never rose to their ideals.  Ochs wrote about liberals who were in favor of Civil Rights so long as it happened in somebody else’s neighborhood or people who favored their union but would not fight for others as they strived for social change.

What Tom Hayden and his colleagues crafted in 1962 was an attempt to put these abstracts into action. With that, The Port Huron Statement was born. He document became the founding statement of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS).  Written in the Michigan community that bears its name, it was a series of thought pieces that desired to address the racial segregation and Cold War ethic that drove decisions coming out of Washington.  As we look back with modern eyes, some of the most glaring social ills of the 1960’s are one yet others remain.Port Huron Statement

We forget that when the decade began, we still lived with our own explicit version of apartheid in the South and a quiet more subtle and implicit variety up North. If you were African American or non-white in the South, there were daily reminders of antebellum life seen through modern slights and social insults because life might have been separate but it was never ever equal. African Americans in the South were legislatively barred from many of the fruits of liberty those on the other side of the color line freely enjoyed.  While Jim Crow did not legislatively extend itself into the North, racism was alive in well in places like Chicago, Boston, and New York, as well as in towns and hamlets throughout every state north of the Rappahannock. It was easier for Northern fingers to point at the South because the Bull Connors and the Orville Faubus’ of the world never cloaked their hatred in the polite language used elsewhere.

Below is an excerpt from “Eyes on the Prize” from PBS

Continue reading

The Luncheon Society—SF/ Hanna Rosin and The End of Men/Palio D’Asti/September 20, 2012

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

End of Men bookEditor’s Note: We are catching up on our narratives after a long absence. Over the next few weeks we will have updates from our past Luncheon Society gatherings.

Since the dawn of time, it seemed that women always found themselves several paces behind men.  Part of it was societal, most was legislative, but writer Hanna Rosin makes the case that in this Post-Industrial Information Age, women have the intuitive tools, the skills, and the drive to pull ahead.

Only a generation ago, women found it hard to get their own credit cards or to purchase a home, without the signature of a husband or the explicit consent of her father.  However, as Hanna writes, something earth-changing took place in 2010 which was essentially ignored in the mainstream media.  This was first year that women surpassed men in the workplace.  More tellingly, the trendlines suggest that this is not some fluke.  When it comes to earning undergraduate degrees, three of the five diplomas issued go to female graduates.  In her book “The End of Men,” Hanna Rosin makes the chase that we are living in the eye of one of the most transformative gender shifts since man emerged from the caves built the modern world; women are poised to take over.

So what does this mean? In Rosin’s book, she makes the case that women have latched on to the opportunities unavailable to their mothers and grandmothers generations earlier. Her book began as a 10,000 word thought piece in The Atlantic in the summer of 2010 and based on the chatter that developed, she was encouraged to expand it into a full length book.  Rosin is no stranger to the revolutionary idea and as the co-founder of Double X Blog for Slate Magazine, she has explored gender issues for more than a decade. While she may paint with a broad brush at times, she elevates a discussion both men and women alike should read.  She even brings the gender conversation into clearer focus by including her husband and son.

We have lived in a world where there has been an appreciation for things male.  Who can forget the opening scene of The Godfather, when Luco Brazi—who served as The Don’s brutal muscle—practiced his lines, hoping that Connie’s first child be a masculine son.  We see it in the crowned heads of Europe who proffered the rights of succession to a male child, even if there were several older (and able) princesses in the wings.  Had George VI and Queen Elizabeth produced a male child—even years after the birth of Princess Margaret—he and not the then-Princess Elizabeth would have succeeded her father. This week in The Netherlands, Queen Beatrix abdicated in favor of her son Willem-Alexander.  After serving 33 years after her mother in 1980, the rights of succession of the Dutch Royal family are now gender neutral.  Princess Catharina-Amalia will someday succeed her father, regardless of gender and any other children which may emerge. Change even comes to institutions that have been frozen by centuries of tradition. Continue reading

The Luncheon Society/Lanny Davis and Michael Steele on the 2012 Election/San Francisco—One Market Restaurant, September 10, 2012/Los Angeles—Napa Valley Grille, September 11, 2012

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Crisis-TalesIn many respects, both Lanny Davis and Michael Steele serve as political anthropologists for the other side; Lanny helps those who watch Fox understand Democrats while Michael Steele helps those who watch MSNBC understand Republicans.

Both Lanny and Michael have held high-profile positions over the years. During the Clinton White House—especially during Monica Lewinsky mess—it was not uncommon to see Lanny Davis defend the President from those who wanted his prosecution and resignation.  Much of what he learned during that period was turned into an earlier book, “Truth to Tell: Tell it Early, Tell it Yourself” and  later “Scandal: How ‘Gotcha’ Politics is Destroying America.”   After leaving the White House, Lanny built a successful practice advising people and organizations how to deal with the political and media fallout that comes from messy and embarrassing situations.

TLS Dinner in LAThis year, Lanny and Michael joined The Luncheon Society for two gatherings.  The first took place in San Francisco for a lunch over at One Market on September 10th.  On the following evening—September 11th—we sat down in Los Angeles for a wonderful dinner at Napa Valley Grille.  Lanny has joined The Luncheon Society on numerous occasions and one of the most memorable was on the eve of the 2008 California Primary, when the Obama people sat at one end while the Hillary people sat on the other.  There were passionate arguments that last long after the desserts were collected.

Continue reading

Roger Ebert (1942-2013) A Luncheon Society Appreciation from 2006

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Roger Ebert“This is my happening and it freaks me out!”  For those who follow cinema, they know  the catchphrase from “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls,” a script that Ebert wrote for Russ Meyer.

This was one of the most fun Luncheon Society gatherings that I had ever planned. It took place, two days after the 2006 Academy Award Ceremony at Michael’s, a entertainment industry-friendly restaurant in Santa Monica.

The big brouhaha was who really deserved the Oscar for best picture, “Brokeback Mountain” or “Crash.” It was a dinner, which started at 7 PM and was supposed to run until 9 PM.  It was at Michaels in Santa Monica, which is staffed by struggling actors and filmmakers.  However, by the time we finally staggered out at 12 midnight, every waiter ran home to get his screenplay or her headshots. He had an early flight to Chicago and I had an early flight to San Jose.

 

luncheon-logo-fcThere were 5 Academy Award winners around the table, not to mention Larry Turman, who produced one of my favorite movies, “The Graduate.” With Ebert, the talk also centered on Russ Meyer, Super Vixens, and “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls” (which was the one screenplay that Ebert wrote.  Sadly it was completely off the record and most of the juicy stuff has been lost to time and addled memory.  However, I have some notes around and will try to rebuild that amazing night for our readers.

Sadly, Roger Ebert would fall deathly ill a couple of months after the luncheon but in that terrible moment, he began the bravest chapter of his life.  Never had he shone more brightly than when his health was the most fragile.

Thanks for a wonderful evening.

 

 

The Luncheon Society-SF/Abrahm Lustgarten author of Run to Failure: BP and the Making of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster/Palio d’Asti Restaurant/August 17, 2012

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Run to FailureTo fully understand what took place during the Deepwater Horizon disaster, when 4.9 million barrels of oil spewed into the Gulf of Mexico during the summer of 2010, you have to look at the corporate culture of BP and how its senior management team blundered into a terrible chain of events.

Reporter Abrahm Lustgarten demonstrates how BP’s series of cascading failures, far beyond the disaster in the Gulf, shows how senior management turned a blind eye to the growing number of risks that were turning up within their American subsidiaries.  By choosing to grow their brand through a series of highly leveraged acquisitions, BP aimed to retire the debt by gutting the budgets for safety and quality control.  By failing to listen to their American subsidiaries, BP played a callous game of Russian Roulette when proportioning risk against gain.  This is an indictment of a corporate culture gone rouge.

Lustgarten, a former staff writer for Fortune Magazine who now writers for Pro Publica, penned Run to Failure: BP and the Making of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster.  For a deeper understanding of what took place at BP, feel free to watch the PBS documentary on Frontline. Below is the promo

Here is the link for the full broadcast from PBS http://video.pbs.org/video/1625293496/

Abrahm LustgartenUnlike their television commercials, the oil industry is a grimy business, from the extraction of varying flavors of crude to the refined product that fuels your car and heats your home.  Many are obvious to how it arrives until there is a massive disaster.   In an industry chocked full of inherent risks, most oil producers are dead serious when it comes to safety management because they understand the true costs of a disaster when something goes terribly wrong.  Many Alaskans still talk of the Exxon Valdez disaster as if it happened last week because the coastline is still dealing with the aftereffects over two decades later.

That was a lesson, Lustgarten says, BP never got around to learning. Continue reading